🔒 This resource is restricted. Please unlock the Teacher View tab first.
Learn from others: Browse anonymised examples from the top 3 and middle 3 answers. No names or candidate numbers are shown.
🔒
Teacher Access
Enter the password to access class data and safeguarding alerts.
Incorrect password. Please try again.
✅
Dashboard Unlocked
Authentication successful. View scripts, download data, and review safeguarding alerts.
🧑🎓 Student Quick Access
Select a candidate to bypass the quiz and view their fully annotated feedback card.
📊 Data
The CSV results file is generated automatically by the Python pipeline alongside this HTML file. No download is needed from here.
⚠️ Safeguarding Alerts
The automated scanner flagged potential risk words in the following student responses. Click a candidate to instantly bypass their quiz and view their full script.
Model Answer — Essay 1: Religion & Animals
Score: 12/12 Band 4
Word Count: ~320 words | A strong Year 7 response — clear argument, both sides, specific religious knowledge, reasoned conclusion.
Agree(Religion SHOULD guide)
Disagree(Not always right)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Hover text for comments
Strong evaluative opening — immediately signals a balanced, 'how far' approach rather than just agreeing or disagreeing. This is Band 4 thinking from the first sentence.I agree to a large extent that religious beliefs should guide how we treat animals, because religions have thousands of years of ethical thought about how to treat living things. However, I do not think religion should be the only guide, because not everyone is religious and society needs laws that apply to everyone.Specific religious knowledge deployed — ahimsa in Hinduism and Buddhism. Names the concept accurately and explains its practical impact. This is exactly the kind of evidence that earns Band 4.Many religions teach kindness towards animals. In Hinduism and Buddhism, the idea of ahimsa — non-violence — means believers must avoid harming any living creature. This has led millions of Hindus and Buddhists to become vegetarian, which also benefits the environment. Islam requires halal slaughter, which means animals must be killed as humanely as possible, showing that religion can provide a clear and specific framework for animal welfare.Christian stewardship — another specific teaching. Shows breadth of religious knowledge across more than one tradition, which is a Band 4 indicator.Christianity teaches stewardship — the idea from Genesis that humans are responsible for caring for God's creation. This means Christians are called to protect animals, not just exploit them. Judaism also has the principle of tza'ar ba'alei chayyim, which forbids causing unnecessary suffering to animals. These religious traditions have existed for thousands of years, long before modern animal welfare laws.Turns to the counter-argument — identifies that religions disagree with each other and that secular approaches exist. This ensures the essay is genuinely two-sided and not capped at Band 2.On the other hand, different religions sometimes disagree about how to treat animals. Some religious traditions allow animal sacrifice, and there is debate about whether halal and kosher slaughter is as humane as modern methods. Furthermore, non-religious people can still be deeply ethical about animals — organisations like the RSPCA do not rely on religion to protect animal welfare.Well-substantiated conclusion — returns to the question, weighs both sides, and reaches a nuanced judgement. Does not simply repeat the introduction. This is confident Band 4 writing.In conclusion, I believe religious beliefs should be one important guide for how we treat animals, but they should work alongside law and science rather than replace them. Religious teachings have inspired great compassion for animals throughout history, but in a diverse society, not everyone shares the same faith, so we also need shared legal standards that protect animals for everyone.
Why this answer earned 12/12 (Band 4):
Immediate evaluative opening — 'to a large extent' signals balance from the first line
Specific religious teachings named accurately: ahimsa, halal, stewardship (Genesis), tza'ar ba'alei chayyim
Genuine counter-argument: religious disagreement, secular animal rights, debate over halal/kosher
Reasoned conclusion that weighs both sides and answers the question directly
Model Answer — Essay 2: Multiculturalism
Score: 12/12 Band 4
Word Count: ~310 words | A strong Year 7 response — clear argument, specific evidence, genuine evaluation of both sides.
Agree(More problems)
Disagree(More benefits)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Hover text for comments
Strong evaluative opening — immediately disagrees with the statement and signals that both sides will be considered. Sets up a Band 4 structure from the start.I disagree with this statement. I believe Britain's multiculturalism creates far more benefits than problems, although I accept that some challenges do exist and need to be addressed fairly.Specific evidence for benefits — economic contribution, NHS, schools. This is the kind of factual, specific knowledge that earns Band 3 and 4 marks. The student is explaining why this matters, not just listing it.Multiculturalism brings enormous economic benefits to Britain. Migrants fill vital skills gaps — the NHS and many schools rely heavily on workers from diverse backgrounds. Without this workforce, essential public services would struggle to function. Britain also benefits from global trade connections through its diverse communities, as people bring knowledge and networks from their home countries.Cultural benefits — diverse food, music, art. Goes beyond the economic to show breadth of thinking. The student explains why diversity is valuable, not just what it is.Culturally, multiculturalism enriches British society through a wider range of food, music, art and ideas. British culture today — including its food, music and sport — has been shaped by contributions from many different communities. Integration programmes and community events bring people from different backgrounds together, showing that diversity can strengthen rather than divide society.Genuine counter-argument — language barriers, parallel lives, tension over immigration. This is honest engagement with the difficulties of multiculturalism, which is what separates Band 3 from Band 4.However, multiculturalism does bring some real challenges. Language barriers can cause misunderstanding and limit social cohesion. There is a risk of 'parallel lives' — communities remaining separate rather than integrating. Political disagreements over immigration have caused real social tension in parts of Britain, and some people genuinely feel that rapid cultural change threatens their sense of national identity.Balanced conclusion — acknowledges challenges but argues that British values provide the framework to manage them. Refers to mutual respect and rule of law. Well-substantiated and directly answers the question.In conclusion, I believe multiculturalism creates more benefits than problems for Britain. The economic, cultural and creative contributions of diverse communities outweigh the challenges. Where problems do exist — like language barriers or social tension — they can be addressed through education, integration programmes, and British values such as mutual respect and the rule of law, which protect every community equally.
Why this answer earned 12/12 (Band 4):
Clear position stated immediately — disagrees with the statement with reasons
Specific evidence: NHS workforce, trade links, integration programmes
Genuine counter-argument: language barriers, parallel lives, immigration tension
Key vocabulary used accurately: multiculturalism, integration, mutual respect, rule of law
Reasoned conclusion that weighs both sides and refers to British values
📋 The Questions & Indicative Content
Year 7 RS & Citizenship | 12-mark Essay — choose ONE question
Essay 1: "Religious beliefs should guide how we treat animals in modern society."
How far do you agree? Give reasons for your answer, showing you have considered more than one point of view.
Essay 2
"Britain's multiculturalism creates more problems than benefits."
How far do you agree? Give reasons for your answer, showing you have considered more than one point of view.
📌 Essay 1 — Arguments you could have used (Religion & Animals)
✅ Arguments FOR (religion SHOULD guide)
Ahimsa (Hinduism/Buddhism): Non-violence encourages compassion and reduces animal suffering
Halal (Islam): Requires humane slaughter — a specific, clear framework
Tza'ar ba'alei chayyim (Judaism): Animals must not suffer needlessly
Stewardship (Christianity): Humans are responsible for caring for God's creation
Long tradition of ethical thought on animals — thousands of years
Plant-based diets encouraged by several faiths — better for the environment
❌ Arguments AGAINST (not the only guide)
Non-religious people can be ethical — secular animal rights movements
Different religions disagree — no single agreed standard
Halal/kosher slaughter debated as less humane than modern methods
Religion is personal — society should rely on law and science
Some traditions permit animal sacrifice or hunting
📌 Essay 2 — Arguments you could have used (Multiculturalism)
✅ Arguments that it creates PROBLEMS
Language barriers can limit social cohesion
Risk of 'parallel lives' — communities staying separate
Racism and hate crime can increase
Political tension over immigration policy
Some feel national identity is threatened
❌ Arguments that it creates BENEFITS
Diverse food, music, art and culture enrich society
Economic growth — migrants fill skills gaps; NHS relies on diverse workers
Global trade connections through diverse communities
British values protect all communities equally
Integration programmes bring people together successfully
📊 Band Descriptors
Band
Marks
What it looks like
4
9–12
Confident, developed argument. Considers at least two viewpoints and weighs them. Uses specific religious teachings or facts accurately. Reasoned conclusion.
3
6–8
Developing argument. More than one viewpoint with some development. Some accurate evidence. Beginning to explain rather than just state.
2
3–5
Simple response. One or two relevant points with limited development. Vague references to religion. Little or no counter-argument.
1
1–2
Minimal engagement. Very general statements. Little or no relevant vocabulary.
0
0
No relevant content, blank, or completely off-task.
Candidate 7106
Word Count: ~127 words | Essay 1
Score: 6/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Some people agree might agree with this statement because they are usally told to treat animals. Most of the people think that Religion told us humans should be treated the same as animals.HoweverHow is it that Most Christians would still want get treated by god beliefs but animals don't.Therefore it's unfairthe other way would either will be letting the use of both the human beliefs wouldn't they maybe be saying it's fair.However some may disagree then with this statement because they would use que Religious belief to animals.Some may thinks that it's have care about animals, that it would be nice Religious belief to animals is were just going to be with them so that they will be in a better place in which is Religious belief to our precious beloved or getting them.In conclusion I pelsonly agree with this statementbecause it's not fair that to see animals suffering from pain.
Overall JudgementWell done. This is a really promising essay for timed conditions. You have built a proper argument with a clear structure: a paragraph for 'agree', a paragraph for 'disagree', and a final conclusion. This is a fantastic foundation to build on! You also bravely tried to look at both sides of the debate, which is a high-level skill. To push into the top bands, the next step is to add specific facts or religious key terms to make your points even stronger. Remember to focus on adding one specific piece of evidence next time.
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Excellent Structure: You organised your essay perfectly with separate paragraphs for the 'agree' and 'disagree' points, followed by a conclusion. This makes your argument clear and easy to follow.
Brave Counter-Argument: You used the word 'However' to show you were thinking about the other side of the debate. Considering more than one viewpoint is exactly what we look for in a strong essay!
One Wish 💡
Add Specific Evidence: In your next essay, try to include one specific religious teaching or key word to support a point. For example, instead of just "Religion told us," you could mention the Christian idea of 'stewardship' (the duty to care for God's creation).
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. What was a major strength of this essay's structure?
2. The feedback praised the use of the word 'However'. Why is this a good technique in an essay?
3. What was the main 'wish' or next step suggested in the feedback?
4. The Christian idea that humans have a duty from God to look after the world and its creatures is called...?
5. What is the Hindu and Buddhist principle of 'non-violence' towards all living things?
6. According to the transcript, what was the main reason the student gave for their final conclusion?
7. An essay that considers more than one viewpoint and uses some accurate evidence is described in the mark scheme as a...
8. In Islam and Judaism, the religious rules for how animals should be slaughtered for food are known as...
Candidate 7108
Word Count: ~189 words | Essay 2
Score: 9/12 Band 4
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Some people may agree with this statement because multiculturalism can cause bad things such as less communication as people to come from different countries and speak different languages. This, makes it harder to talk and do things and get jobs.People may oppose this as multiculturalism can do things many good things for a society like their different skill that in fact can actually help you with getting a job and can also help with communication for example someone could speak multiple languages which help in the a restaurant if tourists come by and allows them to take orders more easily.My opinion is that multiculturalism can be good because people from different cultures can be good and nice as people bring their culture with them, which is cool as you can see part of a country's culture and things without even going there.Some people still might not agree with multiculturalism as a country in their opinion should only have their inhabitants. and that it would be wierd if someone lived in a country that is not theirs.But I personally don't agree as people can live wherever they want and no one can oppose that.
Overall JudgementExcellent. This is a confident and well-structured essay that clearly belongs in Band 4. You have done a fantastic job of looking at both sides of the argument, weighing them up, and then reaching your own clear conclusion. The way you directly countered the 'communication problem' with the 'multilingual benefit' was particularly impressive. For next time, remember to try and include one of the key academic terms we've learned to make your work even stronger.
Try this: "Some people might argue that this could lead to prejudice, as they believe a country's identity is weakened if people from other cultures move there."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Balanced Argument: You did a brilliant job of looking at both sides of the argument. You explained a potential problem (language barriers) and then immediately explained a potential benefit (multilingual skills), which shows you are really weighing up the evidence.
Clear Personal Judgement: It was great to see you state your own opinion clearly and explain *why* you think that way. Your final sentence, 'people can live wherever they want and no one can oppose that', is a really strong and confident conclusion to your essay.
One Wish 💡
Using Key Vocabulary: In your next essay, try to include one or two of the key subject words we have learned. For example, when talking about people having negative ideas about others, you could use the word 'prejudice'. This will make your excellent arguments sound even more academic.
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. What skill did the feedback praise when mentioning "language barriers" and "multilingual skills"?
2. Why was the final sentence of the essay described as "strong and confident"?
3. What is the "wish" or next step for the next essay?
4. The word 'prejudice' means...
5. What does 'multiculturalism' mean?
6. 'Mutual respect' is a key British Value. What does it mean?
7. Which of these was an argument FOR the statement (that multiculturalism creates problems)?
8. Which of these was an argument AGAINST the statement (that multiculturalism brings benefits)?
Candidate 7112
Word Count: ~156 words | Essay 1
Score: 8/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
In this essay I will be talking about how "Religious beliefs should guide how we treat animals in modern society."
Someone may agree with this statement because they should follow their religion. Evidence suggest that muslims do not eat pork. They only eat specific types of meat if they are butchered in a specific way.This shows that you should follow your religion and not kills animals plus your not eating pork.However,someone may disagree with statement because you shouldn't kill animals. Evidence states that in the bible it says you, shouldn't kill any animals because that is God's creation.This is telling us why are we killing God's animals to eat.Links with my point because you shouldn't kill God's animals.To conclude, I personally believe that you shouldn't kills Gods animal because they are his creation. But I do eat God's animals which aren't good. I shouldn't do it and is killing so much animals.
Overall JudgementExcellent. This is a really well-structured essay for timed conditions. You have successfully built an argument with an 'agree' and a 'disagree' paragraph, using specific religious ideas to back up your points. Your conclusion was particularly thoughtful and honest, showing that you are thinking deeply about the topic. For next time, remember to push your explanations a little further to show the examiner exactly how your evidence proves your point.
Try this: Instead of "Links with my point because you shouldn't kill God's animals," you could write: "This supports the argument because if you believe God created animals, then you might also believe that humans don't have the right to destroy them."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Clear Argument Structure: You structured your essay perfectly with an 'agree' paragraph and a 'disagree' paragraph, introduced by 'However'. This is a brilliant skill for writing arguments.
Specific Religious Examples: You used excellent, specific examples from two different religions – Islam (rules about meat) and Christianity (the idea of 'God's creation'). This made your points much stronger than just giving an opinion.
One Wish 💡
Explain Your Evidence: In your next essay, try to add one more sentence after you give your evidence to explain *why* it proves your point. For example, after mentioning the rules in Islam, you could explain how this shows deep respect for the animal's life even when it is used for food.
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. Based on your feedback, what was a key strength of this essay's structure?
2. The feedback praised the use of specific examples from which two religions?
3. What is the "one wish" or target for your next essay?
4. The essay mentions that Muslims only eat meat "butchered in a specific way". What is the correct term for meat that is permissible for Muslims to eat?
5. The "Try this" suggestion in the feedback is designed to help you improve which skill?
6. The essay mentions the Christian idea that animals are "God's creation". What key term describes the religious duty for humans to look after the world?
7. Some religions, like Hinduism and Buddhism, promote the idea of 'non-violence' towards all living things. What is the name for this principle?
8. In an essay that asks you to discuss a statement, why is it important to use a word like "However" to introduce a different view?
Candidate 7114
Word Count: ~226 words | Essay 1
Score: 8/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Someone may agree with this statement because animals are loyal and even tho in the bible it says we have Dominion over the animals, we shouldn't treat them like an object that we can't run out of. we need to treat them. Animals sees us as supirior and act like a leader and because of that they are loyal to us and trust aswell but we don't even treat them the way they treat us. This can be shown with an example of animal abuse for example, a dog can treat us with kindness, learn the tricks we make them learn and follow the orders but if they mess up then they need physical punishment just because they did something we didn't enjoy. We can link this to when the Bible says we have Dominion over the animals, so we have the power but we still need to treat them kind.However, someone may disagree with it because without animals we wouldn't srive. for example without sheep we wouldn't have clothes, or we couldn't do games like dog racing or horse raising. we also need the food for protien and to fill our satisfaction of Hunger. without animals humans wouldn't surive and would be extinct so without animals we are helpless.To conclude, I personally believe we shouldn't Religious beliefs should guide us on how to treat animals in modern society because we should be treated equally and if it says we have Dominion or that we are equall then we need to act as if we are. Even tho people may disagree, we should atleast try to take whats in the Bible and learn from it.
Overall JudgementWell done. This is a really well-structured essay for timed conditions. You have a clear 'for' paragraph, a 'against' paragraph, and a conclusion, which is fantastic. You correctly used the Christian idea of 'Dominion' and explained that it comes with a responsibility to be kind. To improve, try to add one more specific religious idea to make your arguments even more detailed. For next time, remember to plan one key idea for each side of the argument.
Try this: "In conclusion, I believe religious teachings should guide us. Although some people might disagree, the Christian idea of 'Dominion' teaches that our power over animals is a responsibility to be kind, which is a valuable lesson for modern society."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Clear Two-Sided Structure: You structured your essay brilliantly, with one paragraph for 'agree' and one for 'disagree'. Using the word 'However' is a fantastic way to show the examiner you are looking at both sides.
Excellent Use of Evidence: You used the key Christian concept of 'Dominion' and didn't just state it - you explained what it means for how we should treat animals kindly. This is a high-level skill!
One Wish 💡
Add More Specific Vocabulary: In your next essay, try to include one or two more specific key terms. For example, when discussing 'Dominion', you could also use the word 'stewardship' to describe the idea of being caretakers of God's creation.
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. One of your great strengths was your essay structure. What word did you use to signal you were about to start your counter-argument?
2. You correctly used the Christian concept of 'Dominion'. What does this term mean in the context of animals?
3. Your 'wish' for next time is to add more key terms. Which word is often used with 'Dominion' to mean 'caring for God's creation'?
4. In Hinduism and Buddhism, the principle of 'non-violence' towards all living things is a key guide for treating animals well. What is this principle called?
5. Why is it a good idea to include a 'disagree' or counter-argument paragraph in an essay?
6. Some religions have specific rules about how animals should be prepared for food. What is the term for meat that is permissible for Muslims to eat?
7. The final paragraph of an essay is the conclusion. What is its main purpose?
8. An argument that is NOT based on religion (e.g. based on science or law) is called a...
Candidate 7127
Word Count: ~131 words | Essay 1
Score: 6/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Religious beliefs should guide us to How we should treat animals.
Like Religious people say we can eat animals but we should not tourtre them because if we were in there same position we would be so mad.Some Religions like Muslim can't eat Curten food like ham, bacon Just like anything with pork in it they can't eat but if it is hala they can eat it.Some Religious people are Vegan and Vegten well when you don't eat anything that is from an Animal and alot of people think its bad to eat an animal but god said we can do anything with it.Some people are Vegitarian is when they don't eat meat but they eat eggs and drink Milk.
Britain multiculturalism benefits the people that are immigrating to Britain but it doesn't benefit it is keep on going worst.
Overall JudgementWell done. This is a strong start to essay writing, and you should be proud of what you achieved in timed conditions. You have included some excellent, specific religious knowledge about Islam and halal meat, which really strengthens your work. You also explored a range of different views on eating animals. For next time, remember to explain *why* your examples are important.
Try this: "For example, Islam gives clear guidance on how to treat animals. Muslims cannot eat pork, and other meat must be 'halal', which shows how a religious belief directly guides what people eat."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Specific Religious Knowledge: You used the example of Islam, pork and halal meat correctly. Using specific facts like this is much better than just saying 'some religions have food rules'.
Considering Different Views: You didn't just give one opinion. You explored the ideas of eating meat kindly, being vegetarian, and being vegan, which shows you are thinking like a true RS student!
One Wish 💡
Explain Your Evidence: In your next essay, try to use linking phrases to explain *how* your evidence answers the question. After a fact, try adding a sentence starting with "This shows that..." or "This is important because..." to connect it back to your main point.
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. Which specific religious term did this student use correctly to describe meat that is permissible for Muslims to eat?
2. What was a key strength of this essay's argument, mentioned in the 'Two Stars' feedback?
3. The feedback 'wish' is to explain your evidence more. Which of these phrases is best for linking a point back to the question?
4. In Hinduism and Buddhism, the principle of 'non-violence' towards all living things is called...
5. The Christian idea that humans have a special responsibility to care for the planet is known as...
6. According to the feedback, what was the reason for the second 'star' (⭐)?
7. The 'wish' suggests using phrases like "This shows that...". Why is this a good exam technique?
8. What is the Jewish principle that animals must not suffer needlessly called?
Candidate 7142
Word Count: ~171 words | Essay 2
Score: 6/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
multiculturalism is where different religion genders and races comes as one. Basically like one community all in a mix.
Someone may agree with this statement because they might think there are gonna be a couple changes such as foods in the supermarkets like the food they sell like maybe meat. And for some who tries joining communitys they may be targets for racism and a commynut y isn't about that its about coming together and be more fair to eachover.
However,someone may disagree with this statement because they may think that having a multicultral society is a good thing because being a multicultral society means to be fair to one and other it also means you can learn new things such as peoples religion their race and how they grew up. which can be
To conclude, I personally beleive that having a multicultral society is a good thing because obviously adviously you can learn new thing experiment New things so I think having a multicultral society is a good thing.
Overall JudgementWell done. This is a really solid attempt under exam conditions. You have built a clear, two-sided argument which is the most important skill at this stage. You identified a key problem (racism) and a key benefit (learning from others), and you reached a personal conclusion. To make this even stronger next time, try to add one specific, real-world example to back up one of your points.
Try this: "Some people might argue multiculturalism causes problems because they worry that rapid changes, like new foods appearing in supermarkets, mean their own culture is being lost."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Excellent Two-Sided Argument: You did a brilliant job of looking at both sides of the argument. You used the word 'However' to clearly show you were moving to a different viewpoint, which is fantastic evaluation.
Clear Definition: You started your essay with a really clear and simple definition of multiculturalism. This shows you understood the key term in the question right from the start.
One Wish 💡
Use a Specific Example: In your next essay, try to include one specific, real-world example. For instance, when you mentioned learning new things, you could have talked about the celebration of festivals like Diwali or Eid in British cities. This turns a good point into a great one!
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. What word did your teacher praise for showing you were looking at a different viewpoint?
2. What was praised as a strength at the very start of your essay?
3. What is the 'one wish' or main target for your next essay?
4. What was the main 'problem' of multiculturalism that you identified in your essay?
5. What was the main 'benefit' of multiculturalism that your essay focused on?
6. A key term for different communities mixing and living together successfully is:
7. According to the marking rules, why is it okay for a conclusion to be brief in a timed essay?
8. Unfairly judging someone based on their race or religion before you know them is called...
Candidate 7147
Word Count: ~214 words | Essay 1
Score: 6/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
I KNOW PUT MY OPINION IN HERE BUT I WROTE A MISSING
R
A
P1
Someone may agree with this statment because they might not be religious and probably thinks that there is no one to tell him how to treet animals.I also don't believe that the religious beliefs should tell us how to treet our pets or animals to me it's just like a papper but maybe too religious it's everthing.
R
A
P2
HoweverSomeone might disagree with this statment because they are religious and they really do believe in what it says. I'm not saying people who aren't religious can't believe in it I'm trying to say that religious people would follow the topic more. And may think the words is the only way to treet animals.(My Opinion) to be honest i dont really know because i have never really thought which is right way maybe they are both right.
[Page 2]
Someone might also agree because they want to tred animals differenlly like if religious beless said you can only feed an animal chicken but the owner didn't want to that why they would disagree because he don't want to be told.
Extended Opinion
I would probably go for agree because it sound alot more reasonable so my answer is (Agree)
Overall JudgementWell done. This is a great first attempt at an exam essay. You have built a really clear, balanced argument by looking at why someone might agree and then using 'However' to show the other side. This structure is fantastic! You also thought carefully about the different views of religious and non-religious people. To make your excellent points even stronger next time, try to include a specific religious idea or teaching.
Try this: Instead of "religious people would follow the topic more," you could write, "For example, a Christian might argue the Bible teaches 'stewardship', meaning God gave humans a duty to care for all animals, so their beliefs are the most important guide."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Excellent Structure: You used phrases like "Someone may agree..." and "However, someone might disagree..." which is a brilliant way to build a balanced argument and show you are considering both sides.
Considering Different Views: You did a great job of thinking about why a non-religious person and a religious person might have different ideas on this topic. This shows great empathy and understanding.
One Wish 💡
Use Specific Evidence: In your next essay, try to include one specific religious teaching or key word to support your points. For example, you could mention the Christian idea of 'stewardship' or the Hindu principle of 'ahimsa' (non-violence). This will make your brilliant arguments even more powerful.
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. Your feedback praised your essay's structure. What word did you use well to switch from one viewpoint to another?
2. One of your "stars" was for considering the different views of which two groups?
3. What is the main "wish" or target for your next essay?
4. The Christian idea that humans have a duty from God to look after the world and its animals is called...
5. The Hindu and Buddhist principle of causing no harm to any living being is known as...
6. In RS, what does it mean to build a 'balanced' argument?
7. Why is using a specific example like 'stewardship' a good way to improve an essay?
8. What is the main purpose of a conclusion at the end of your essay?
Candidate 7237
Word Count: ~198 words | Essay 1
Score: 6/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Be Someone may agree because with this statement because in the beginning god created the heaven and the earth later and Decde Decades later had the first ever animals Dino Soars now this can add up to the statement because now in todays life dinosaurs are extent extint (no longer living) this is part of the statement because Vegans don't eat anythg animal based and not going to tie in some way or not this is linked because part of the ten commandments I think it says not to killnow some animals today die just to be eaten by humans in religious belife of christianity and know the animal population has probaly gone down as well as they don't have right and cant defind them selfs because they cant speak.However,Someone may disagree with this statement because, what if they realy love meat and don't care They are killed just for you to eat them all up they if they still eat meat and not cared about anything about animals because the person eating the meat loves the flavor of it and dosn't even care if the family animal had a family or had its own family.To include, I personally believe and agree that "religious beliefs should guide how we treat animals in modern society", because Im a christian and I belive that if it's something about religion I have to agree with whatever it is like a statement or saying.
Overall JudgementA great effort. You have built a really well-structured essay here, looking at reasons to agree and disagree before giving your own view. It was fantastic to see you use Christian ideas like the creation story and the Ten Commandments as evidence for your argument. You also showed good thinking by considering why someone might disagree. For next time, focus on explaining how your evidence proves your point.
Try this: "I agree that religious beliefs should guide us, because core teachings like the Christian idea of 'stewardship' or the Ten Commandments' rule against killing give a strong moral reason to protect animals from harm."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Clear Structure: You set out your essay very clearly with a paragraph for 'agree', a paragraph for 'disagree', and a conclusion. Using 'However' to switch sides was excellent.
Using Religious Ideas: You brought in relevant Christian beliefs to support your argument. Linking the Ten Commandment 'do not kill' to how we treat animals was a really thoughtful idea.
One Wish 💡
Explain Your Evidence: In your next essay, try to add a 'This shows that...' sentence after you give a piece of evidence. For example, after mentioning the Ten Commandments, you could explain *why* this proves your point (e.g., 'This shows that a core religious rule can be used to argue for animal rights').
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. What word did this student use to signal they were switching to a counter-argument?
2. Which religious idea did the student use to argue for treating animals well?
3. What is the main 'wish' or target for this essay to work on next time?
4. What is the Christian idea that humans have a duty to look after the world God created?
5. The principle of 'non-violence' towards all living things, found in Hinduism and Buddhism, is called...
6. A good essay considers different viewpoints. Which of these is a strong reason someone might DISAGREE that religion should guide animal treatment?
7. The feedback suggests a stronger conclusion. Why is "Christian teachings suggest a duty to protect life" stronger than "I agree because I'm a Christian"?
8. This essay was praised for having two different viewpoints. In which mark band does an essay start to "consider more than one viewpoint"?
Candidate 7238
Word Count: ~155 words | Essay 1
Score: 6/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Somone may agree with this statement becauseanimals are not her for an humans purpose their here to live their own life, their also sign of life animal,religous beleifes help make sure that animals aren't betrayed for eating and tescing. Religouse laws protect them. Yes the Should guide how we treat animals.
However somone may disagree with this becausethey may think that their personal preffrences and their religion shouldn't be put together because they beleive their religion could not tell them what to do.They may beleive they should be left to make their own decisions They may think just because they follow a religion doesn't mean they have to be told not be eating things.A person may also beleive that animal shouldn't be treated with luxrie because they are not human and also soe they should be used for human preferenes.To. conclude, I personally beleive that religouse beleifs should guid us with the way treat animals so we now how they should treated or if they should be treated as a human or a minoritie.
Overall JudgementWell done. This is a solid argument with a clear structure. You have successfully looked at both sides of the debate, which is a really important skill in RS. I was particularly impressed with your reasons for why someone might disagree, as you thought carefully about personal freedom. To get into the next band, remember to include one specific piece of religious evidence to support your points.
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Excellent Structure: You organised your essay really well with a paragraph for 'agree' and a paragraph for 'disagree'. This makes your argument very clear and easy to follow.
Thoughtful Counter-Argument: Your 'disagree' paragraph was very strong. You explained clearly why someone might feel their personal choices are more important than religious rules, which shows great critical thinking.
One Wish 💡
Use Specific Evidence: Your points are good, but they are a bit general. In your next essay, try to include one specific religious teaching or key word. For example, you could mention the Christian idea of 'stewardship' or the Hindu belief in 'ahimsa' (non-violence).
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. One of the 'stars' (strengths) awarded to this essay was for its excellent structure. Why was the structure good?
2. The feedback praised the 'disagree' paragraph. What was the main reason given for why someone might disagree with the statement?
3. What was the 'wish' (target) for improvement for the next essay?
4. The Christian idea that humans are responsible for looking after the planet and its creatures is called...
5. The Hindu and Buddhist principle of 'ahimsa' is the practice of...
6. The Jewish teaching that animals must not suffer needlessly is known as...
7. To improve the 'agree' paragraph, which of these sentences would be the best addition?
8. In an essay like this, what does it mean to 'evaluate'?
Candidate 7241
Word Count: ~181 words | Essay 1
Score: 8/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
The word guide means to direct so religious beliefs should direct the treatment of animals in modern society.Someone may agree with this statement because they can see how many animals went extinct for example a white tiger.Someone may agree with this statement because they can see how many innocent get killed from hunter for fun. Evidence is that when people have killed deer and there are videos of deer getting shot with a gun so what I'm trying to explain is that people should stop killing animals because they have souls?Think about it the bees their honey is one of the most important ingredient in food.However,someone may disagree with this statement because in the bible God said that humans should be more superior than animals.For example the people who kill animals, they would most likely be Christian because of what god said. So what I'm trying to say is that if your devoted to christianity and God said you're more superior their should be no problem.To conclude, I personally believe that religious
Overall JudgementExcellent work. This is a really strong essay for Year 7, especially under timed conditions. You have successfully structured your answer to show both sides of the argument, which is a very important skill. You used some great real-world examples and bravely included a religious idea in your counter-argument. Remember for next time to try and use a specific key term like 'stewardship' to make your religious points even stronger.
Try this: "For example, a Christian might argue that the Bible gives humans 'dominion' over animals, which some interpret as a right to use them."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Clear Counter-Argument: You built a strong counter-argument using 'However...' and tried to support it with a specific religious idea from the Bible. This is a high-level skill!
Good Use of Examples: You used a great range of real-world examples to support your points, like the white tiger, deer hunting, and the importance of bees. This makes your argument much more convincing.
One Wish 💡
Using Key Religious Vocabulary: In your next essay, try to include one or two specific religious key terms. For example, instead of 'God said humans are superior', you could use the Christian idea of 'stewardship' or 'dominion'. This shows the examiner your detailed knowledge.
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. The feedback praised your use of 'However...'. Why is this word so useful in an essay?
2. Which of these was an example used in your essay to show why animals are important?
3. Your 'wish' or target for next time is to use more key vocabulary. What is the Christian idea that humans have a duty to look after the world for God?
4. What is the Hindu and Buddhist principle of non-violence towards all living things?
5. Your essay mentioned a religious idea that humans are 'superior' to animals. Which religion did you link this idea to?
6. The feedback suggested using the key term 'dominion'. What does 'dominion' mean in a religious context?
7. What is the name for the Jewish principle that animals must not suffer needlessly?
8. The feedback praised the essay for having a clear structure. What did this structure involve?
Candidate 7242
Word Count: ~117 words | Essay 1
Score: 6/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Someone may agree with this statement because some people could follow their religions be strictly religious and follow what the Holy Book says what to do for example the Holy Book could say that you can use animals how we want to.However,Someone may disagree with statement because they might not be strictly religious and not do everything if so the Holy Book says. for example, the Holy book can say we can do what we can do with animals but treat animals like from cruelty.To conclude, I personally believe that we don't have to treat animals like nothing.
Overall JudgementA great effort. You have built a really clear essay here, looking at one argument and then using "However" to introduce a counter-argument. This is exactly what we are looking for! I was also very impressed that you included your own personal judgement in the conclusion. To push into the top bands, your next step is to include a specific religious idea or key term. Remember to use a specific example to support your points.
Try this: "For example, the Christian Holy Book teaches the idea of 'stewardship', which means humans have a duty to care for animals and not be cruel."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Clear 'For' and 'Against' Structure: You did a brilliant job of looking at both sides of the argument. Using the word "However" to switch between viewpoints is an excellent exam technique.
Giving Your Own Judgement: It was fantastic to see you state your own view in the conclusion with "I personally believe...". This is a high-level skill and shows you are starting to evaluate the arguments.
One Wish 💡
Use Specific Examples: Your points about "the Holy Book" are good, but to make them even stronger, try to name a specific religion or teaching. In your next essay, try to include a key term like Christian 'stewardship' or Hindu 'ahimsa' to support your argument.
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. One of the key strengths of this essay was its clear structure. What word did the student use to signal they were moving from one viewpoint to a different one?
2. The feedback praised the student for giving their own judgement. Which phrase is a good way to do this in a conclusion?
3. What was the main 'wish' or target for improvement for this essay?
4. In Christianity, the idea that humans have a responsibility to care for God's creation is called...
5. The Hindu and Buddhist principle of 'ahimsa' is the belief in...
6. Which of these is a strong argument AGAINST relying only on religion to guide animal treatment?
7. In an exam, if you are unsure whether your essay is a Band 2 or a Band 3, the teacher should...
8. The terms 'Halal' and 'Kosher' are religious rules primarily concerned with...
Candidate 7243
Word Count: ~153 words | Essay 1
Score: 6/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Someone, may agree with this statement because people that are a certain religion have on have a way of treating animals whether its killing, shooting or cooking.When the quote says "religious beliefs should guide how to we treat animals". It is evident that religion religions all have different ways of treating animals, one way to think about this is like killing a member of your family you and them are the same blood.However, someone may disagree with this statement because religion and treating animals are two different thingsas it is evident that some religions do not have care in animals but some do, but it is highly how both sides treat animals.Howeverbeing in religion should not be connected or influenced with the belief that animals are linked to any religion.To conclude I personally believe that animals should have a type of link to some religions as in there holy books animals was involved.
Overall JudgementWell done! This is a really promising first essay. You have built a perfectly balanced argument, looking at both the 'agree' and 'disagree' sides of the question, which is a very high-level skill. You also reached your own personal conclusion at the end. To make your brilliant structure even more powerful, the next step is to add specific examples to support your points. For next time, remember: Point, Evidence, Explain. You've got the Point, now let's add the Evidence!
Try this: "For example, some religions have specific rules, like the Hindu belief in ahimsa (non-violence), which guides many to be vegetarian."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Excellent Structure: You structured your essay perfectly, with a paragraph for 'agree', a paragraph for 'disagree', and a conclusion. This is a fantastic way to build a clear and balanced argument.
Brave Counter-Argument: You used the word 'However' to introduce the other side of the debate. This is what debaters do! It shows you are thinking carefully about different viewpoints.
One Wish 💡
Add Specific Examples: In your next essay, try to include one specific religious example for each side of your argument. For instance, you could mention Christian 'stewardship' or the Hindu principle of 'ahimsa' to make your points even more convincing.
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. One of your biggest strengths was your essay structure. What is a good way to structure an argument?
2. You used the word 'However' really well. What is the main purpose of a word like this in an essay?
3. Your 'wish' or next step is to include more specific examples. Which of these is the most specific piece of evidence?
4. The Hindu, Buddhist and Jain principle of 'ahimsa' is a key term for this topic. What does it mean?
5. What is the Christian concept of 'stewardship' in relation to animals?
6. You wrote a clear conclusion. What should a good conclusion do?
7. The terms 'halal' and 'kosher' refer to rules about how animals are prepared for food in which two religions?
8. If you were arguing that religion SHOULD guide how we treat animals, which of these points would be most helpful?
Candidate 7244
Word Count: ~78 words | Essay 2
Score: 6/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Someone may agree with this statement because there is confusion about cultures in and some people don't understand different cultures so they might offend the culture and its people.However, some may disagree with this statement because some people enjoy other cultures especially the good from different cultures around the world.To conclude I personally believebritains multicultural society brings joy and colour to the world like celebrations, holidays parties food and many more delecasies to enjoy.
Overall JudgementWell done. This is a great start to your first big essay! You have built your argument really well, looking at both the problems and the benefits of multiculturalism. I was especially impressed that you gave your own clear opinion in the conclusion and backed it up with lovely examples of food and celebrations. For next time, remember to add a specific example or fact to each point you make to give it more weight.
Try this: "However, some may disagree, arguing that multiculturalism enriches Britain with new ideas and traditions, like the Notting Hill Carnival which celebrates Caribbean culture."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Excellent Structure: You set out your essay perfectly, looking at one side of the argument and then using the brilliant word "However" to introduce the other side. This is exactly what top-level essays do!
Great Use of Examples: Your conclusion was fantastic. Instead of just saying multiculturalism is good, you gave specific examples like "celebrations, holidays, parties, food" which really brought your point to life.
One Wish 💡
Adding Specific Evidence: In your next essay, try to add one specific 'real-world' example to support each of your main points. This could be a festival, a law, or a famous event that proves your point and makes your argument even more powerful.
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. What word did this student use that was praised for showing a counter-argument?
2. What did this student do in their conclusion that made it strong?
3. What is the main 'wish' or target for this student to work on next time?
4. What is the correct term for a society where many different ethnic groups and cultures live together?
5. The idea that different groups should mix together and become part of a wider community is called:
6. According to the mark scheme, which of these is a key 'British Value' that helps multicultural societies succeed?
7. Thinking of a negative opinion about a group of people before you even know them is called...
8. The 'Try this' sentence in the feedback mentions the Notting Hill Carnival to show an example of...
Candidate 7246
Word Count: ~192 words | Essay 1
Score: 6/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Someone may agree with this statement becausethey believe that animals shouldn't be harmed.Many believe this seeing how they are service animals like dogs and how they help disabled people showing it is unfair for an innocent animal to get tested or be treated unfairly.Christians and some of other religions believe that God said we can treat ~~how we want to treat them~~ that animals meaning we should treat them how we would treat our neighbours.However, someone may disagree because with this statement becausethey believe animals should be harmed for everything because they do not want to poisned and die.Animals all over the world are tested for beauty products like mascara or concealer to see if it is healthy or non-deadly for a women to have on her face~~which~~ which is unfair not showing fairness to the animals God has created.To conclude I personally believe that religious beliefs should guide how we treat animals nowadays so Gods animals his makings can stop being harmed and being used for deadly products... so that instead they can live the world freely and die when time is right.
Overall JudgementWell done. This is a really promising essay for your first timed conditions! You have built your answer with a clear structure, using one paragraph for and one against, which is exactly the right technique. You also used some excellent, specific examples like service dogs and makeup testing to make your points clear. The best part was your strong, personal conclusion which summed up your own view clearly. For next time, focus on making sure your 'disagree' paragraph really explores the other side's best argument.
Try this: "However, someone might disagree by arguing that human safety is more important than animal welfare. For example, they might say that testing medicines on animals is necessary to make sure humans don't get poisoned by new drugs."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Excellent Structure: You organised your essay perfectly with a paragraph agreeing, a paragraph disagreeing, and a conclusion. This made your argument really easy to follow.
Great Use of Examples: You used brilliant, specific examples to support your points. Mentioning service dogs and testing mascara showed you were thinking about the topic in the real world.
One Wish 💡
Develop Your Counter-Arguments: In your next essay, try to really imagine you are someone who disagrees with you. What would be their strongest reason? Explain that reason fully, even if you don't agree with it. This will make your own argument even more powerful.
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. What was a key strength of this essay's structure?
2. Which specific, real-world example did the essay use to support its argument?
3. What is the main 'wish' or target for improvement for the next essay?
4. The Christian idea that humans have a duty to look after the world God created is called...
5. The feedback suggests a stronger counter-argument could be about 'human safety'. Why is this a strong counter-argument?
6. The Hindu and Buddhist principle of causing no harm to any living thing is known as...
7. Your teacher praised your use of a clear conclusion. A good conclusion should always...
8. Besides religion, what is a common 'secular' (non-religious) reason for treating animals well?
Candidate 7248
Word Count: ~213 words | Essay 2
Score: 8/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Multsculturalism Means when there is many different culture's and beliefs in one society.
Some may agree with this statement because there was riots/religous wars a way's go and their was many conflicts between religons in the past. They may al so agree with statement because they think that whatever the king or queen's religon is is what they should believe in. They also may agree with this statement because they think that their religon is superior than others.
Some may disagree with this statement because there should be democra equality in the world and it is not fair that not everyone is the same.Some may also agree disagree with this statement because they people with hijabs or other things that they have to wear for their religon will not be able to wear it.Another benefit is that people feel safe inside what they do and they don't have any worries what they do.Multiculturalism has more benefits because if everyone was the same it would be boring and the reason why Britain is so diverse is because of multiculturalism and the fact most of the God in Britain is not from Britain but it is from other countries.
To conclude I personally belive that multiculturalism brought more benefits than problems because multiculturalism means that there is more e clan in the world.
Overall JudgementExcellent work. This is a really well-structured essay for timed conditions. You have clearly thought about both sides of the argument and have included some fantastic, specific ideas to support your points. I was particularly impressed that you used the example of the hijab to explain religious freedom. To get into the top band next time, remember to always explain *why* your point is a problem or a benefit.
Try this: "They also may agree with this statement because they think that their religon is superior than others, which could cause prejudice and conflict between different groups."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Balanced Argument: You did a brilliant job of looking at both sides of the argument, using 'Some may agree...' and 'Some may disagree...' to structure your essay. This is a high-level skill!
Specific Examples: Your use of a concrete example like "hijabs" to talk about religious freedom was fantastic. It makes your argument much more powerful than just talking about 'religious things'.
One Wish 💡
Develop Your Explanations: In your next essay, try to add a 'This shows that...' or 'This is a problem because...' sentence after each point you make. This will help you explain your ideas in more detail and push your arguments to the next level.
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. One of your "stars" was for creating a 'Balanced Argument'. What does this mean?
2. The feedback praised you for using a specific, concrete example to make your point. Which example was it?
3. What is the main tip (your "wish") for improving your next essay?
4. What is the correct definition of 'multiculturalism'?
5. An unfair, negative attitude towards a person or group, often based on their religion or race, is called...
6. Which of these is an argument that multiculturalism creates MORE PROBLEMS?
7. Which of these is an argument that multiculturalism creates MORE BENEFITS?
8. What is the main job of the conclusion in an essay like this?
Candidate 7251
Word Count: ~278 words | Essay 1
Score: 7/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
~~Essay 1~~ Religion & animal society.
Religion is a culture by gods or no gods.
To conclude, I personally believe that animals should have rights, or not.
Animals are being, hunted, experimented, and eaten by us. Some religion don't accept animal experimentation and the SAME Religion accept animal experimentation. Some of us believe that sacrafising an animal that helps humanity but some of us believe that we should not harm other animals and hunt them which create: Vegetarian and vegans.
Vegetarian's means that means they don't eat meat but eat dairy products and other.
Vegans same with Vegetarian's don't eat meat but not ~~even~~ alowed to eat dairy & sweet products only vegies.
but anywas religion thinks that is wrong to harm their God creation's but others think "We can do whatever we want, we are supior over them," Which sounds true which we hunt
[Page 1]
them and killed them for food and some keep them as pets like: Dog, cat, parrot, However, lizard and cetra. Which animals can be legal as a pet: Racoon, snakes (Non-venom) and sugar gliders but it comes at a price: You need to take care of them.
Back to religion. When you are born or join a religion you need to know they're diet which sometimes contain meat is they're halal or not.
Christian, orginate from ~~the lord as you can eat anything especially fast food but don't betray your face religion.~~
~~In addition, they're diet is... I honestly do not know maybe fish or veggies.~~
If you want to be, in any religion but don't know what they're diet is well google it or go to the wikipedia the free encydepedia that anyone can edit, so you could look what they ate.
If you watch bunny ralph or ralph ~~the~~, it explains how it feels, to be experimented by us and tells us about animal expermigtation and disturbs you. So means, that animals can feel pain and other, religion don't accept expermitation on animals.
[Page 2]
Overall JudgementWell done. This is a really thoughtful attempt at a tricky question under time pressure. I was so impressed that you used the 'Save Ralph' film as an example – this is a brilliant way to bring the debate to life and show you are thinking about the real world. You also did a great job of showing two different sides to the argument. To make your next essay even stronger, focus on explaining *how* each example you use helps to prove your point.
Try this: "The 'Save Ralph' film clearly shows that animals can feel pain. This supports the religious view that we should not experiment on them, because beliefs like stewardship teach that we must care for God's creation."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Powerful Real-World Example: Using the 'Save Ralph' film to discuss animal testing was fantastic. It's a specific, modern, and memorable example that really shows the suffering involved.
Considering Different Viewpoints: You did a great job of showing two sides of the debate, contrasting the idea that humans are "superior" with the religious belief that we shouldn't harm God's creations. This is a key skill in RS!
One Wish 💡
Develop your points with 'This shows that...': In your next essay, try to add a sentence after each piece of evidence (like the 'Save Ralph' film) that explains *how* it answers the question. For example, "...this shows that religious beliefs about non-harm are still very important guides for us today."
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. The feedback praised you for using a powerful real-world example. What was the name of the film you mentioned about animal testing?
2. You were also praised for looking at different viewpoints. Which two opposing ideas did you contrast in your essay?
3. What does your 'wish' or target, "Develop your points with 'This shows that...'", ask you to do in your next essay?
4. The Christian idea that humans are responsible for looking after the world and its creatures is called...
5. What does the Hindu and Buddhist principle of 'Ahimsa' mean?
6. The essay mentions 'halal'. In which religion are halal rules for meat important?
7. The rewritten sentence in your feedback linked the 'Save Ralph' film to which specific religious idea?
8. Which of these is a strong argument that religion should NOT be the only guide for animal treatment?
Candidate 7255
Word Count: ~280 words | Essay 2
Score: 6/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Some People may agree with this statment because they feel like different cultures coming into different countries like the UK bringing all there different culture and it might take out the originality of the country and People who are from the country like there type of foods there cultural wear or traditions that they do will be gone. And that makes sense because some people would be annoyed if they just came and took whats there's and the people who do believe that.
[s] Some People may agree with this statment because they feel like different cultures coming into different countries like the UK bringing all there different culture and it might take out the originality of the country and People who are from the country like there type of foods there cultural wear or traditions that they do will be gone. And that makes sense because some people would be annoyed if they just came and took whats there's and the people who do believe that. [/s]
[s] Some cultures may agree with to try new foods make more friends and people can have peace it's than this but multiculturalism can also tension because that crime may be also with lots of which can be sad [/s]
different cultures being in one place that means it will become a global place.And People also think to make multiculturalism a better and a bigger thing we should challenge Prejudece and people who discriminate colored People, religious People and so on.In my opinion I think that the statment "Britains Multiculturalism creates more problems than benefits is true. Because how would we like by only sticking one culture we will never change.
Overall JudgementWell done. This is a really thoughtful first attempt at a complex topic. You did a great job of explaining one of the main arguments *against* multiculturalism – the idea that a country's original culture might be lost. It was also excellent that you tried to include a counter-argument about challenging prejudice. The most important thing to remember for next time is to make sure your final conclusion clearly follows on from the arguments you have already made.
Try this: Instead of 'Because how would we like by only sticking one culture we will never change,' you could write an argument like: 'However, by only sticking to one culture we will never change or learn new things, which is a major benefit of multiculturalism.'
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Clear Supporting Argument: You made a really clear point about why some people might worry about losing their 'originality' — their foods, clothes, and traditions. This was a strong start!
Considering Both Sides: It was great to see you think about the other side of the argument, especially when you mentioned challenging prejudice and discrimination to make things better.
One Wish 💡
Link Your Conclusion: In your next essay, try to make your conclusion a summary of your best points. For example, you could say "In conclusion, although multiculturalism has benefits like..., I believe the problems such as... are more significant because..." This makes your final judgement feel really strong.
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. My teacher said I made a clear point about why some people might worry about multiculturalism. What was this worry?
2. What was the second 'star' I earned for my essay?
3. What is my 'wish' or target for my next essay?
4. In my essay, I mentioned 'prejudice'. What does this word mean?
5. The essay was about 'multiculturalism'. What is the best definition of this term?
6. Which of these is a major BENEFIT of multiculturalism mentioned in the mark scheme?
7. Which of these is a potential PROBLEM of multiculturalism, according to the mark scheme?
8. When I wrote "In my opinion...", what skill was I showing?
Candidate 7256
Word Count: ~212 words | Essay 1
Score: 7/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Someone may disagree with this statement because many animals get go through a lot of things. Animals are harmed for us humans, we eat meat which are from animals. This means that they are killed for food and in different ways. killing and animals have reasons like: killed to be eaten, and they could get hurt from animal testing testing drugs on animals. people can could feel really bad for them. this This is why people are vegen or vegeterian. Another reason they could agree with this statement is because humans dont like to see animals get killed and want to save their lives.
However, someone may agree with this statement because if animals are not killed, people won't have food to eat. It ea could also be that some may not want to be vegeterian, some may think its good for how bad people can treat animals because if they were not tested with drut dg drugs and humans just tried it people could die. people dont want to risk their lives an to test drugs but they also think that animals arn't as important as humans.
To eon To conclude, I personally think that agree with this statementbecause if animals are being treated that badly, religious beliefs should defino fr definatly guide how people treat animals. This is because if people hurt animals and they really care about religion, they should follow the rules of not killing creatures. However I kind of agree because if animals weren't killed no meat would be here for us.
Overall JudgementWell done. This is a really thoughtful essay that looks at both sides of a complex argument. You used excellent real-world examples like vegetarianism and animal testing to support your points, showing you are thinking carefully about the topic. Your conclusion was particularly strong because you made a clear decision but also showed you understood the other point of view. For next time, try to include one specific religious idea to make your argument even stronger.
Try this: "if people really care about religion, they should follow religious rules, such as the Hindu and Buddhist idea of ahimsa, which means non-violence to all living things."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Excellent Structure: You structured your essay really well, looking at one side of the argument in your first main paragraph and the other side in your second. This is a key skill for top marks!
Strong Counter-Argument: Your point about animal testing was very thoughtful. Explaining that it is done to prevent humans from dying is a powerful counter-argument that shows you are thinking like a real ethicist.
One Wish 💡
Use Specific Religious Evidence: In your next essay, try to include at least one specific religious idea or key term. For this topic, you could have mentioned 'stewardship' for Christians or 'ahimsa' for Hindus to make your points even stronger.
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. One of your "stars" was for your excellent structure. Why is a two-sided structure good in an RS essay?
2. Your point about animal testing was praised as a strong counter-argument. What made it so effective?
3. Your "wish" for next time is to use a specific religious key term. Which of these is a Hindu concept meaning 'non-violence'?
4. What is the Christian idea of 'stewardship' which was mentioned in your feedback?
5. In your essay, which of these was a reason you gave for why people might DISAGREE with the statement (i.e., think animal use is justified)?
6. You used vegetarianism as a real-world example. In your essay, what did this example help to show?
7. The end of your essay was praised for being evaluative. What does 'evaluation' mean in an RS essay?
8. The Jewish principle of 'tza'ar ba'alei chayyim' is the idea that...
Candidate 7257
Word Count: ~206 words | Essay 1
Score: 8/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
I agree becausein some religions like Muslim or islam, they think we should treat some animals fairbut in Christianity humans have dominion over animals.Some people may agree with this statement because maybe they are in a religion that does not kill or harm any animals because maybe for some religious its sins.Howeverin Christianity some christians may still not agree with this statement because in the bible it says humans have dominion over animals which Christians agree with.However However, some people may disagree because with this state statement because they may think we can do anything we want to themor to some people may be hunters and say it does not matter if your religious or not you we can still do anything we want to animals.Furthermore some people may also say that we have free will and say that in the bible even if it says humans have the power over animals so its fine if we kill them or do anything to themTo conclude I personally believe that we should not kill any animals for no reason reason but I think we should keep animals as pets or helpers.Even though some people may disagree I still think we shall do no harm to them.
Overall JudgementExcellent effort. This is a really strong essay for timed conditions, showing that you can think about different sides of an argument. You included specific religious ideas like 'dominion' and also considered non-religious views, which is fantastic. The structure of your essay, with clear paragraphs for 'agree' and 'disagree', was very effective. For next time, remember the key is to explain *how* your evidence proves your point.
Try this: "Furthermore, some people might argue that because of free will, they can choose to ignore religious rules. They might believe that this gives them the right to hunt or use animals as they see fit, regardless of what a holy book says."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Using Key Vocabulary: You correctly used the important Christian term 'dominion' to explain the idea that humans have power over animals. Using specific words like this really strengthens your argument.
Building a Balanced Argument: You did a great job of looking at both sides. You had a clear paragraph for religious views supporting the statement and another for non-religious views against it. This is a vital skill for top marks.
One Wish 💡
Explain Your Evidence: In your next essay, try to add a 'This shows that...' sentence after you give a piece of evidence. For example, after mentioning 'dominion', you could explain: 'This shows that some Christians might believe their holy book gives them the right to use animals for food or work.'
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. One of your "stars" was for using the key Christian term 'dominion'. What does this term mean?
2. Your other "star" was for building a balanced argument. What does this mean?
3. Your "wish" for next time is to add an extra sentence after giving evidence. What is the purpose of this sentence?
4. The Christian idea that humans have a duty to look after the world for God is called...
5. Which religious principle, often found in Hinduism, means 'non-violence' towards all living things?
6. What was a non-religious argument you used in your essay to disagree with the statement?
7. According to the mark scheme, an essay that considers more than one viewpoint and uses some accurate evidence (like a key term) is a "Developing argument". Which band is this?
8. The 'Try this' sentence in your feedback rewrote one of your points to be stronger. What was the main improvement?
Candidate 7260
Word Count: ~73 words | Essay 1
Score: 5/12 Band 2
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Someone might agree with this statement boose they follow a religion. There religions book or like there religion leader says. Like it said in their books of Islam that in the quran it says that you can eat pork.Some people might disagree with the statement boose they dont have a religion or they have a religion but they dont follow it.To conclude I personly belive that it is up to you you follow your religion for actually kill what it teaches you.
Overall JudgementGreat effort. This is a solid start to essay writing, and you should be proud of your work under exam conditions. You have built your answer with a clear 'for' and 'against' structure, which is a fantastic skill. You also bravely tried to use a specific religious example from Islam. For next time, focus on making sure your example directly supports your point.
Try this: "For example, in Islam, the rules of halal slaughter are designed to be a humane way of treating animals, which shows religion guiding people's actions."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Clear Structure: You set out your essay really clearly, with one paragraph for people who agree and another for people who disagree. This is exactly what a good balanced argument needs.
Using Religious Evidence: It was brilliant that you tried to use a specific example from a religion (Islam and the Qur'an). Using real-world evidence is a high-level skill, so well done for attempting it!
One Wish 💡
Explain Your Evidence: In your next essay, try to add a sentence after your example that begins with 'This shows that...'. This will help you explain to the examiner *why* your evidence is important and how it proves your point.
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. What was a key strength of this essay's structure?
2. The feedback praised you for trying to use an example from which religion?
3. What sentence starter was suggested to help you explain your evidence next time?
4. In Christianity, the idea that humans have a duty to look after the world is called...
5. The principle of 'ahimsa' (non-violence) is a key belief in which two religions?
6. An argument that goes against the main statement is called a...
7. The term 'halal' in Islam refers to rules about what is...
8. Because this was written in a timed exam, what are teachers told NOT to penalise?
Candidate 7261
Word Count: ~99 words | Essay 1
Score: 6/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Someone May agree with [crossed out] this statement because [crossed out] in some religiousns people like to eat alot of animals even the animals that are not, considered for eating so they wouldn't care how animals are treated.Howeversomeone may [crossed out] disagree with this statement because they believe that treating animals violently isnt good and that [crossed out] people should care about how animals [crossed out] are treated.To [crossed out] conclude, I personally believe that animals should be treated fairly because if you hurt or kill an animal then the population of those animals will decrease and their familys would miss them.
Overall JudgementWell done. This is a really promising start to essay writing. You have built your answer with a brilliant structure, looking at one side of the argument, then the other, and finishing with your own view. This is exactly what we are looking for! To push into the higher bands, your next step is to add a specific piece of evidence to make your points even stronger. Remember to include one key term or religious example next time.
Try this: "However, a Hindu might disagree with this statement because of the principle of ahimsa, which teaches non-violence and means all living things should be treated with compassion."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Excellent Structure: You organised your essay perfectly into three parts: a paragraph for the argument, a paragraph against it, and a conclusion. This makes your reasoning really clear.
Great Counter-Argument: You used the word "However" to introduce a different point of view. This is a fantastic skill that shows you are thinking carefully about both sides of the debate.
One Wish 💡
Add a specific example: In your next essay, try to include one specific religious teaching or key word to support a point. For example, you could mention 'stewardship' for Christians or 'ahimsa' for Hindus when talking about animal care.
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. What was a key strength of this essay's organisation?
2. Which word was highlighted as being a great way to start a counter-argument?
3. What is the main 'wish' or target for the next essay?
4. The Hindu principle of 'ahimsa', which could have been used as an example, means...
5. In Christianity, the idea that humans have a duty to look after the world for God is called...
6. Why is it important to look at both sides of an argument in an RS essay?
7. What are the Islamic rules for treating animals humanely for food called?
8. Which of these is a specific Jewish teaching about not causing needless suffering to animals?
Candidate 7262
Word Count: ~214 words | Essay 1
Score: 7/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Someone may agree with this statement because they may think might think that if there is a religious saying it can help treat animals better.Religion is a big thing in some families so they may always follow tradition. If there is a belief that states not to treat animals more humanly most is most likely for people to listen.In modern society, animals are mainly used for testing then treated like nothing, if a religious belief guided them there would be less animal testing.However someone may disagree with this statement because they may don't have a religion.A person may will think like this because there wouldn't be cures for people with health issues until animals.Although it is harmful in modern society someone will only be thankful for the animals bravery. Someone who disagrees wouldn't like to a religious guide since if humans were in control and not careful something can go wrong.To conclude, I personally believe there should be some religious guides guides with animal testing due to how harmful they are getting treated.I agree with this statement because if there are no restrictions the animal popularity will decrease.Religious beliefs so might be able to guide modern society but only if it is a really really powerful line.If there is a belief then that could impact the loss of animals and increase in animal testing.
Overall JudgementGreat effort. This is a solid Band 3 response because you have built a really clear, two-sided argument. You looked at why someone would agree with the statement and then, importantly, why someone would disagree. This shows good thinking and is the main skill we are looking for in these essays. You also reached a personal conclusion at the end which was based on your arguments. For next time, remember to include one specific piece of religious evidence to push your mark even higher.
Try this: "Someone may agree with this statement because a religious teaching like the Hindu idea of ahimsa (non-violence) can help people to treat animals better."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Clear Two-Sided Structure: You did a brilliant job of separating your essay into paragraphs for 'agree' and 'disagree'. This makes your argument really easy to follow and is a fantastic skill for a Year 7 student.
Strong Counter-Argument: It was great to see you think about why someone might disagree. Your point about animal testing being needed for medical cures was a really thoughtful and relevant counter-argument.
One Wish 💡
Use Specific Evidence: Your arguments are good, but they are a little general (e.g. "a religious saying"). In your next essay, try to include one specific religious teaching or key word (like 'ahimsa' or 'stewardship') to make your argument even more powerful.
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. One of the main strengths of this essay was its structure. What does this mean?
2. The feedback praised the essay's "counter-argument". What was the main counter-argument used?
3. What is the "One Wish" or main target for improvement for the next essay?
4. Which key term means 'non-violence' towards all living things and is found in Hinduism and Buddhism?
5. The Christian idea that humans have a duty to look after the world, including animals, is called...
6. In the first paragraph, what was the main reason given for why religious guides would be followed?
7. What does it mean to 'evaluate' in an essay, as seen in the conclusion?
8. This essay was placed in Band 3. What is the main feature of a Band 3 essay?
Candidate 7264
Word Count: ~180 words | Essay 2
Score: 6/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Some people may dissagree with the this statement because in Britain theres is 5 very importen values you must follow mutul Respect, libetry of the law, tolorenc of the religens, (I forget the other two) and without thise rules they won't have shaped Britan today and they have shaped loads of contrys today.Some people may agree with this state ment as before this there was a so horribl king in England that could do anything he who was both the leader of England and also kill anybody he likes, prisners, then and finally could use any torcher meatherd and also after the be British em Empire, some of the contryes (India, Pakistan) hated that they were pulled of over at England whe be British em Empire also all mos most thos huthigh him after first they took gold, people and any anything to fight in a world wor two probably gotes for India credin bad culture diversity to thos two too.To conclud, personaly this bleave that I agree with this statement as eventhen Britans did bad things nobodys perfict.
Overall JudgementWell done. This is a really thoughtful answer to a tricky question, written under time pressure. It was fantastic to see you argue for both sides, using the British Values to show the benefits and the history of the British Empire to show the problems. You also reached a clear personal conclusion at the end. For next time, focus on explaining exactly how your evidence proves your point.
Try this: "In the past, before ideas like the 'rule of law' became strong, powerful leaders could cause huge problems, showing why having shared values is so important in any society."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Excellent Knowledge of British Values: You remembered three of the five key British Values and explained why they are important for shaping the country. This was a fantastic way to start your counter-argument!
Brave Use of History: It was great to see you use a historical example like the British Empire to support your argument. Thinking about the impact on countries like India and Pakistan showed real critical thinking.
One Wish 💡
Explain Your Evidence: In your next essay, try to add a sentence that clearly links your evidence to your main point. For example, after mentioning the British Empire, you could add: "This history created tensions that can still be a problem in a multicultural society today."
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. Which of these is a key 'British Value' that you correctly identified in your essay?
2. Which historical example did you use to argue that multiculturalism can have problematic roots?
3. What is the main 'wish' or target for your next essay?
4. The idea that everyone is protected by the same set of laws, which you mentioned, is called...
5. What does the term 'tolerance' mean in the context of British Values?
6. According to the mark scheme, which of these is a potential BENEFIT of multiculturalism?
7. According to the mark scheme, what does 'integration' mean?
8. In an essay, what is a 'counter-argument'?
Candidate 7312
Word Count: ~180 words | Essay 1
Score: 9/12 Band 4
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Some people might agree with this statement because in many holy books a God/s will tell us that no one is more or less equal to an animal, because everyone deserves the same, equal treatment.In the kuran it states that no person has dominion over animals, whether it's a bird, fish, pig, cheetah or lion, which demonstrates equality for everything and everyone.However,someone may disagree with this statement because in the Christian Creation story it states that God gave us dominion power over the animals, so we can choose what to do with it. Another reason someone may disagree is that they [crossed out] because [/crossed out] dislike animals and as they bring warmth and companionship.
To conclude, I personally believe that no one has the privileges to have dominion power over animals because everyone, and everything deserves the same kindness, sympathy and respect somewhere in their lives.Another reason someone might agree with this statement is because everyone loves animals as they provide love, warmth and comfort to peoples lives. They also bring joy and love into peoples live and brightening their day. They also help them in their stormy or cloudiest days which is why they deserve the same treatment.
Overall JudgementExcellent work. This is a confident and well-structured essay for Year 7. You have successfully included two different religious viewpoints, using specific evidence like the Qur'an and the Christian idea of 'dominion' to make your points clear. Best of all, you reached a thoughtful conclusion where you weighed up the ideas. For next time, remember the exam technique of adding a 'This shows that...' sentence to develop your points even further.
Try this: "Another argument is that non-religious people can be ethical too; for example, their feelings of love and companionship for animals guide them to be kind, without needing a religious rule."
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Using Specific Evidence: You didn't just say 'some religions believe...'. You named the 'kuran' and the 'Christian Creation story', and you explained the key idea of 'dominion'. This is a fantastic skill!
Building a Counter-Argument: You brilliantly used 'However' to introduce a different point of view. Showing both sides of a debate is what makes a top-level essay.
One Wish 💡
Develop with 'This shows that...': In your next essay, after you give a piece of evidence (like the 'dominion' idea), try adding a sentence that starts "This is important because..." or "This shows that...". This helps explain the link back to the main question.
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. What was a key piece of religious evidence the essay used for its counter-argument?
2. The feedback praised the use of the word 'However' because it helps to...
3. What was the 'wish' or target for next time?
4. The Christian idea that humans are responsible for looking after God's creation is called...
5. The Hindu and Buddhist principle of 'non-violence' towards all living things is known as:
6. According to the feedback, why was mentioning the 'kuran' (Qur'an) a strength?
7. What is the main purpose of a conclusion in an RS essay like this one?
8. The Islamic rules for how animals should be treated, including during slaughter, are known as:
Candidate 7320
Word Count: ~180 words | Essay 2
Score: 8/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Someone may agree with this statement because of the prejudice. for example someone saying Japan and china are same or clutchen your purse in a elavator wen a black man or woman enters. prejudice comes around Britain like a virus thanks to Britain's multiculturalism.However, someone may disagree with this stament because Britain's multiculturalism may have problems but it can still bring us togather. for example chinese shops produce food maybe or maybe not from their countries and it's delightful, or chicken and chops i see don't even get me started on chicken and chips it a very special question to have it ever. In the darkest of times we can all brings ourselves up in Britain.To conclude, I personally belive Britain's multiculturalism cause more benefits than problems. one to freedom of speech, the things we all learned from eachother everyday and help eachother we offer every day as well. so I know there are some dark moments but these light moments will le ad us to a better tomorrows of multiculturalism.
Overall JudgementExcellent. This is a really thoughtful and well-structured essay, 7320. You have done a brilliant job of looking at both sides of the argument. Your examples of prejudice were very powerful and showed a mature understanding of the topic. You then balanced this perfectly with a positive argument about how diversity enriches our lives. The best part was your conclusion, where you made a clear, reasoned judgement. For next time, try to add one more different example for each side of the argument.
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Powerful Examples: Your examples of prejudice, like clutching a purse in an elevator, were specific and very effective. This shows you can connect big ideas to real-life situations.
Strong Conclusion: You didn't just repeat your points at the end. You made a clear personal judgement and gave new reasons for it, which is a fantastic skill in essay writing.
One Wish 💡
Develop Your Range: In your next essay, try to include two different examples for each side of the argument. For instance, as well as the benefit of food, you could have also mentioned the economic benefits of multiculturalism (e.g., how our NHS is supported by people from all over the world).
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. One of the strengths of this essay was its use of powerful, real-life examples. Which example was highlighted as being particularly effective?
2. What made the conclusion of this essay particularly strong for a Year 7 student?
3. What is the main 'wish' or target for the next essay?
4. In the essay, the word 'prejudice' is used. What does it mean?
5. The essay is about 'multiculturalism'. What is the best definition of this term?
6. According to the mark scheme, which of the following is a potential PROBLEM of multiculturalism?
7. According to the mark scheme, which of the following is a potential BENEFIT of multiculturalism?
8. In the 'disagree' paragraph, what was the main benefit of multiculturalism the student focused on?
Candidate 7321
Word Count: ~130 words | Essay 1
Score: 6/12 Band 3
Agree(Supporting argument)
Disagree(Counter-argument)
Judgement(Evaluation)
Someone may agree with this statement because animals are just like us and should be cared for and treated with respect because we love them. In some religions, killing animals is considered a sin because they love animals.However,someone may disagree with this statement because we need animals to survive, for example, our meat comes from animals like chicken, pigs, ox, cow etc. In christianity, God says that humans are more superior than animals and that killing them is fine because we need them to survive.To conclude, I personally believe that humans should have more dominion and power than animals because we are smarter, stronger, reliable, etc. If we didn't eat animals, we wouldn't be strong and healthy as we are today.
Overall JudgementWell done. This is a really well-structured essay for timed conditions. You have a clear 'for' and 'against' paragraph, and you reach a personal conclusion at the end which is fantastic. You also included a specific religious viewpoint from Christianity which makes your argument much stronger. The one thing to remember for next time is to try and include specific religious key terms to make your points even more detailed.
Two Stars ⭐⭐
Excellent Structure: You built your essay perfectly with an 'agree' point, a 'disagree' point introduced with 'However', and a final conclusion. This is a top-level skill!
Using Specific Evidence: It was great that you named Christianity and explained the belief that humans are 'superior'. Using a specific religion is much better than just saying 'some people believe'.
One Wish 💡
Develop with Key Terms: In your next essay, try to add a specific religious keyword to one of your points. For example, when you mentioned religions that see killing as a sin, you could have named the Hindu idea of 'ahimsa' (non-violence).
🧠 Quick Check — unlock your full feedback
Answer 3 out of 4 questions correctly to see your annotated essay and score.
1. Your feedback praised your essay's 'Excellent Structure'. What did you do well?
2. You were also praised for using 'Specific Evidence'. What was the example of this?
3. What is the 'wish' or main target for your next essay?
4. What does the Hindu and Buddhist concept of 'ahimsa' mean?
5. The Christian idea that humans have a duty to look after the world for God is called...
6. In Islam, the rules that require humane slaughter for meat are known as...
7. Based on your feedback, which of these would be the strongest sentence to add to your essay?
8. In your conclusion, you used the word 'dominion'. What does this mean in a religious context?
Overall Class Weaknesses & Models
1. Generalisations instead of Specific Evidence: Many students made general statements like "a holy book says..." instead of naming a specific religious teaching, key term, or real-world example to support their point. 👉 Model: For example, the Hindu principle of 'ahimsa' teaches non-violence, which is why many Hindus are vegetarian.
2. Undeveloped Explanations: Students frequently offered a piece of evidence but failed to explain *why* it was relevant or *how* it proved their argument. They missed the crucial linking sentence. 👉 Model: Some Christians believe in 'dominion' over animals. This shows that they might think it is acceptable to use animals for food and scientific testing.
3. Limited Use of Key Vocabulary: Essays often used everyday language where a more precise, academic key term was needed. This weakened the overall quality of the argument. 👉 Model: Living in a society with many different cultures, like the UK, is called 'multiculturalism', and it brings benefits like a variety of food and festivals.
4. Lack of Argumentative Balance: Weaker essays only gave one point for each side of the argument or presented a very brief counter-argument before dismissing it. 👉 Model: On the other hand, a different viewpoint is that animals have rights. For instance, the 'Save Ralph' campaign highlighted animal suffering in cosmetic testing, persuading many people that this practice is cruel and unnecessary.
Teacher Next Steps
1. Evidence Scavenger Hunt: Give students five general statements (e.g., "Some religions have food rules"). In pairs, they have 5 minutes to race to find a specific, named piece of evidence for each from their notes (e.g., "In Islam, 'halal' rules guide how meat is prepared"). Share the best examples as a class.
2. "This Shows That..." Tennis: Teacher 'serves' a fact (e.g., "Diwali is known as the festival of lights."). Pick a student to 'return' it by adding a sentence beginning "This shows that..." (e.g., "...this shows that light is an important symbol of good over evil in Hinduism."). That student then serves a new fact to another student.
3. Keyword Connect: Put 4-5 key terms from the unit on the board (e.g., Stewardship, Prejudice, Dominion, Ahimsa). In small groups, students have 5 minutes to write a single paragraph that correctly uses and connects at least three of the words. The group with the most coherent paragraph wins.
4. Argument Switch: Pose a simple debate question from the topic. Give students 3 minutes to silently write down as many points as they can FOR the statement. Then, shout "Switch!" and give them another 3 minutes to write as many points as they can AGAINST it. Spend the final 4 minutes sharing the 'against' points to practise developing counter-arguments.